|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 5 Hindsight for Tomorrow SeriesA Neglected Majority:Parents Bereaved by theTraumatic Death of their Child
by Ronald C. Oliver, Ph.D., BCCAssumptionsWhen I began interviewing parents grieving the traumatic death of their child I was utterly naïve about the depth of their pain. The original goal for my dissertation was to assess the effects that an acute traumatic crisis had on a person's faith, i.e., their meaning-making. Bereaved parents were to provide the "experience set" to examine the phenomenon. However, as I experienced their stories, my research goals and my life changed. A dad shares his experience of going to his son's side just after a car hit him.
Lee's mother talks about her life after a car hit her son.
These accounts are not anecdotal, they are the norm. We exchanged gifts over their kitchen tables. They gave me their story; I gave them a hearing. We both benefited. A mother whose son had died seven months before the interview told me, "When I got that little letter requesting a visit in the mail from you, I was so glad. I think that I was getting to the point where if I didn't talk to somebody, I was just gonna be lost forever." While each story revealed truth particular to its storyteller, the collective stories yielded collective wisdom. The sacred expanse of each parent's experience refused to fit into the research box I had crafted. Their stories compelled me to lean forward and listen. LessonsAs my colleague Chaplain Terry Tatro stated it, "to dodge is like a dagger." I've heard so many bereaved parents share variations of the same story: they're in a store, someone they know starts down the aisle toward them, sees them, turns around and goes another way. Parents experience a secondary loss when potential caregivers and supporters avoid them. Some supporters pull back because they can't fix the situation. When supporters feel they must relieve parents' pain they create an unobtainable goal. Beneficial care is embodied in those people who can stand still in the pain in order to create a sanctuary where parents can be and say what they must. The bereaved will more readily forgive those who offer well intentioned but insensitive care, than those who do not bother or are too afraid to care. In this instance, the fear or anxiety experienced by the caregiver will never be greater than the fear and anxiety experienced by the bereaved parent.
The care of bereaved parents is a marathon, not a sprint. Every bereaved parent has heard it, "You should be over this by now." "You should take the pictures down." "When are you going to get back to normal?" A year after the death of their son, John, the dad, said,
When a child dies traumatically, shock, that constellation of physiological and psychological responses designed to hold terrible news at a manageable distance, can last for six, eight, or even twelve months. Looking back on the accident in which her son was killed a year and a half before my interview with her, Linda said,
More often than not, a prolonged shock reaction is normal. We wish parents would hurry up and get over it. The secret is, they want the pain to go away too! However, some things take time to work through and the big griefs are among those things. Alice Demi & Margret Miles (1987) co-authored a Delphi study in which they asked twenty-five bereavement experts to express their opinion regarding the appropriateness of thirty bereavement behaviors at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 60 months after a death (see Table 1). Their survey covered two of the areas supporters often have concerns about--the frequency of parents visitation of the grave and how quickly parents disassemble the child's room (usually the younger the child, the greater the pressure to dismantle the room).
Thus, at twelve months only 48% of these experts are concerned about the survivors who leave the deceased room intact. At twelve months only nineteen percent of the experts report concern about regular visits to the grave. While I agree that opinions vary among experts, the point to be made is that normal grieving will very likely go on for a long time. The greater the grief, the more time will be required to do the work of grief. That's normal and that's okay. One harsh example from a recent interview comes quickly to mind. A couple of months after her baby died suddenly and unexpectedly the mother called a close friend who coincidentally is a psychotherapist. After bearing her soul the friend-therapist responded, "Listen, shit happens. You're going to have to get over this." The "friend" then ended the conversation. Mom was crushed. The call for help had been rejected and she felt both discounted and humiliated and even less eager to ever share herself again. Bereaved parents too often are compelled to separate themselves from anyone who imposes unrealistic expectations on the pace of their grieving. Often the only people who understand are other bereaved parents. In the presence of each other they extend grace to wonder, get cussin' mad, cry—all without any admonition to get over it.
Community makes the critical difference. On a cold January day while driving north on Interstate 65 just after a terrible ice storm, I took notice of the devastation inflicted on the trees at the forest's edge. Hundreds of the trees nearest the interstate had fallen under the weight of the ice. Interestingly to me, only trees at the forest's edge fell while the mass of the forest remained standing. What made the difference? The trees that could distribute the weight of the ice among their neighbors could collectively bear the weight that brought down an individual tree. Their intertwined branches and roots anchored them into a mutually dependent relationship and thereby assured their very survival. The trees pushed away by wind and ice from the natural support of their forest friends, fell down. As goes the forest, so goes the tree.
When a child dies, most often the parents who do okay will credit the core group of people who formed around them for the long haul to help get them through. When the weight of the storm bears down, the parent who is caught by the long term supportive branches of understanding supporters can survive the storm. The parents who lack this support may, like the lone tree, fall. As goes the community, so goes the individual. A mother whose young son was hit by a car told me about the day her friends came to her aid,
This mom went on to describe what "carried me out meant." The friends made her leave the house—they dragged her out of her house. She looks back on that day with gratefulness. That was the day that her friends risked themselves to boldly enter her experience and care for her. During my interviews with bereaved parents over the years I have met so many who have given up on church—not just their church, but all organized religion. Most often parents cite the failure of their community of faith to live up to the explicit and implicit promises they made to care for the parents. While care usually starts off strong, it can have a short shelf life. Wayne Oates noticed how this could happen:
The erosion of the support network can be a deceptive process. Supporters can feel like no care is required because they left with the parent the invitation, "Call me if you need me." The truth is that few of us in our pain will ever do that and even fewer parents possess the will to call for help at a time when they are emotionally depleted and filled with the temptation to withdraw from all but requisite relationships. In the care of bereaved parents, the initiative for care always rests with the supporters. I recently interviewed a couple whose teenage son had died four years prior. The couple had been very active in their church—both held positions of leadership. After their son died in a freak accident, church members poured forth support—meals, calls, people in the home—for about two weeks. After that, virtually nothing. They stopped going to their church, no one called to see why. When church members stopped by the father's office at the bank where he worked as a vice-president to ask him when he was going to come back to church he shared with them how angry he was for being abandoned by them. Nothing changed. One day dad came home glad to see the youth minister's vehicle in their driveway. Dad told me what he thought, "Finally someone has come to check on us." As it turned out, this minister had stopped by because he wanted some advice because he was facing a surgical procedure similar to one undergone by this father. The father complained, "He never once brought up my son. He never once asked us how we were coping." These parents rejected all religious communities because, right-or-wrong, they felt rejected by what had been their religious community. A ResponseGiven the profound needs of bereaved parents I established a Bereavement Intervention Program (BIP) at Kosair Children's Hospital (Louisville, Kentucky, USA) for parents whose children die from a traumatic accident. In 1994 the Children's Hospital Foundation provided $4,500.00 and in 1997 a $48,250.00 grant from the Norton Healthcare Community Trust Fund continued and expanded the program. The goals of the BIP initiative are:
Several assumptions underlie this initiative. First, the people that parents live with are best positioned to help them. Second, the supporters will likely be highly motivated to help and therefore are likely to be receptive to learning new helping strategies. Third, care of the parents can be improved if common cultural myths about grieving are addressed. Fourth, and perhaps most notably, this program owns the initiative for taking the care to the parents and it seeks to "commission" the supporters to do likewise. The appreciation of this program by parents and supporters has been almost unanimously positive. As well, the BIP was discussed in Hospitals & Health Networks (January 1999, p. 20), presented as a concurrent workshop at the 1998 Annual Conference of the Association for Death Education and Counseling, and, just recently, was described and discussed in a plenary presentation by Mary Fallat, M.D. (Director of the Kosair Children's Hospital Trauma Service) in October, 2000 at the Annual Meeting of The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. (The October, 2000 presentation has been submitted for publication in the Journal of Trauma.) Final Thoughts
After the first year of life, more children die from trauma than all other causes combined. The numbers are staggering. These parents' needs are widely misunderstood and overlooked. Pastoral caregivers must lead the campaign to understand parents' experience and to equip parishioners as initiative taking, community-sustaining care providers.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| Last Updated ( Wednesday, 12 November 2008 16:21 ) |
Latest Columns
- The Goddess, Liberation, and Love in By the River Piedra by Jan Waples
- Leadership Safari: Pastoral Leadership in the 21st Century - Part 3 by D. Leslie Hollon, Ph.D.
- The Root Chakra and the Ground of Being by Mary Fraser, Ph.D.
- Psalm 114: Presence/Absence, by Anne Ogden
- Getting a Grip: The Legend of Bagger Vance by Jan Waples, M.Div., B.C.C.
- Psalm 138: A Temple, by Anne Ogden
- VMAT2, Genes, and Spirituality by Kay T. Roberts, Ed.D., ARNP
- Stories and New Identity at Weeping Willow Church by David Sawyer, Ph.D.
- Clinical Use of Scripture: A Variation on the Theme of Lectio Divina by C. Roy Woodruff, Ph.D.
- Every Person Marries a Foreigner? by G. Wade Rowatt, Ph.D.
- Psalm 61: A Higher Voice, by Anne Ogden
- Power in the Client-Therapist Relationship: An Ethical Issue by Mary Ellen Yates, M.Div.
- The Evil You Do: Spirituality in the Ghost Story by Jan Waples, M.Div., BCC
- Psalm 25, The Path, by Anne Ogden
- Reflections on Being vs. Doing in Pastoral Counseling by C. Roy Woodruff
Newsflash
A new feature of the Oates Journal is the publication of Special Issues, which gather four to six articles around specific topics. Upcoming Special Issues of the Oates Journal will include:
|



